General Discussionmax calibration now 3500 [CONFIRMED]

his first match after update today probably still had the hidden calibrated mmr unaffected by the new patch. however, after he finished the match, next match he directly dropped to 3.5k

haHAA what now smurfers and account sellers haHAA

get fucking fucked

How do you conclude to that? He hasn't finished all his calibration match. Let's wait and watch what valve has done.

but what will 4ks complain about now when they lose games

can confirm now.

After 4.3k average and won, his subsequent two matches all stuck at 3.5k.

Guess 3.5k is the new limit, LOL

RIP SMURF 2017
RIP ACC SELLER AND FARMER 2017

how does that fuck up acc selling and boosting, if anything those services will become more expensive in the future = more money for sellers = more sellers

it will be harder for account sellers to sell newly calibrated accounts at 4.8-5k.

Those bots that we see in watch tabs are mostly calibrated @ 4.9x k

Now it seems to be limited to 3.5k at most.

All the 5ks 6ks smurfers and acc sellers gathering in my place now GGWP

^ GG 3k low 4k brackets

In this case boasting will become more popular while the price of the high mmr account is incrase due the high demand and low quitity

HAHA SO 5K 6K NOW WILL PLAY IN 3 K MOSTLYHHAHAHA

They still will be 1K who want smurf to 2K, 2K to 3K.

If I am selling acc all I need to do is play more and rise it as high as possible with effectiveness and the price will rise up,will ppl stop buying account? I DON'T THINK SO YOU DOG FACE

ONE WAY OR ANOTHER ALWASYS WILL BE FUCKED UP MATCHMAKING

4K WAS FUCKED NOW 3K WILL BE REKT

VALVS DONT FIX ANYHING U CANT VS SYSTEM AND PEOPLE

zDonFrank, what bots are you talking bout?

his 5th match

http://imgur.com/a/R448d

Winning has nothing to do with mmr change in calibration matches. I tested this myself, you can lose all 10 games (although it's unlikely if you play well, but theoretically) and still play in higher avg mmr than your first calibration match was.

Actually is some thread I read that if you play really well but still lose the match ,you will be more likely to be put in higher MMR. I don't remember the thread. I will try to find.

latest update

after getting highest kda and max hero dmg for his team in last 3.5k average match,

his next match he is still getting 3.5k average.

seems now they have limited it to 3.5k.

GG

3.5k limit ? LoL i dont think it is true :-)

ZDonfrank
Dude u are 6k .. Why dont u try it ? Or if any bluestar want to try it i have an id with 4k party mmr and tbd solo ... We can check it

oh thats why i got fucktards on my rankeds now

awesome.

3.6K climbing will be a pain in the ass with all the fucktard smurfs tryharding their entire existence in the galaxy

gg volvo, at least you didn't fucked the game.

I just checked my friend's latest 3.5k average matches, there were 4 players TBD, and all their previous games all VHS, but now HS. LOL

https://www.dotabuff.com/players/384935483

this guy currently in my friend's 3.5k average. previous ranked calibration matches all vhs. its his 2nd game today and now in HS 3.5k ,LOL

@elitefire i have now seen 8 TBDs in 3.5k average matches.

most of their previous games all VHS. now all dumpstered to 3.5k

NICE MOVE VALVE

Omg ... It'd better if i move to my main then xD

Lol zDonFrank is surely enjoying this

actually his last game is vhs..check again :)

Read again ^
He said his CURRENT game is in hs.
"this guy currently in my friend's 3.5k average. previous ranked calibration matches all vhs. its his 2nd game today and now in HS 3.5k ,LOL"

I bet he will be vhs after CURRENT game :)

Why do you want that tho? ^

they testing still maybe they wont do it

3.5 max calib is a lil bit way too unfair. ive heard some people calibrated 4.2~

so some games in 3k will be based on luck ; where is winning a game is based on rng that depends if there is an account seller calibrating a fresh account on my team or on in the other team
I said some games.
that could limit acc buyers because if the limit was 3.5k-4k who the fuck would buy it. now this leads to acc sellers to play more games and that will lead to raising the acc prices which leads into less people buying accounts. and in that case I dont care.

I agree with this calibration as I feel new players probably won't really make it over 3k anyways the only point of the higher calibration cap is for people who know how to play and want to abuse the system as a way to get higher mmr without working for it. I believe 4k cap is reasonable.

congrats , you judged valve's entire system because of your friend's shitty play

Why unfair ? I think it's fair if someone is not smurfing.

Imagine a new player that will callibrate for the first time. How realistic would it be for him to have higher skill than 3.5k ? 3.5k max callibration is fair and its a realistic highest possible callibration number that a new player could callibrate after few hundred games.

If someone is callibrating over 3-3.5k %100 its a smurf acc

5 tbd in the game, asked all of them, all previous 4.2k-4.9k in calibration

http://imgur.com/a/Q75ID

gg wp

asked all the TBD guys. confirmed now 3.5k is the limit.

all the TBD shown in pic above played in 4.xk average calibration matches prior to today's patch

http://imgur.com/a/E2MIA

7th match now, still 3.5 average, lol

because you're forcing 3ks to play against 4-7k players every other match

@Cookie

Maybe true for a while but once these already smurfed ppl get passed from there things will be how it should be. Good for the future

if this is true, this will force the majority of 3ks into 2k, because 3k will definitely become the new 4k

@cookie

So be it. Worth it to get rid of current garbage system and smurfing

poor 3ks get rekt midd by 6k SF 20 min 5 items sfs

disaster:D

It will most dfinitely be much harder to get 4k now... And y, totally unfair to 3ks, most of the games will be decided by smurfs...

@The Katz

Victims of "hopefully past" garbage system. It will be good in the long run though for everyone in whichever bracket they are

There always will be smurfers. Deal with it.