slark huskr ursa bristle encha to send these 2k overthrowers to the fucking stone-age
ta is decent, havent tried lifestealer but its another of those low cd ie. 100% skirmish uptime solo kill heroes
slark is ultimate shitfucking hero in overshit. You shit fuck and dumpster shitstains back to the fucking stoneage so ez, more than half of them dc after 4-5 mins.
You didn't get the idea guys. My goal is not to win, but to make someone's life miserable. What I was doing so far is picking ursa, getting oov-phase and just running and some particluar guy until he either dies or goes back to base and then I just stalk him the whole game, camping right outside of his base, spamming ">Good game, well played" in chat whenever I kill him and watch this kid rage.
I was just wondering if there's some better hero to do that. I guess skywrath Q spam or lina are decent and so is slark.
man of steel is super garbage, rush is ok, shindler's list is good. without the penultimate scene (with the watch) this film would be actually godlike.
i m talking about their objective quality, and not whether i liked them or not.
scary movie is 10/10 garbage, but in the same time i rly enjoyed watching it; citizen kane is really decent, but not fun to watch.
Who decides what movies are "good" or "bad" though? Such things will always be subjective. Yes, better acting, plot, directing etc CAN make a movie better, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't watch a movie just because your friend or whatever said it's bad, you may still end up liking it.
It doesn't, I just think there is no such thing as "objective quality" because the quality of a movie is dependant on way too many things to possibly be objective.
well, basing on what i studied, u can easily get a rough evaluation of film's quality basing on acting, directing, camera movements, scene dynamics, panorama, etc., and u do not have to be a godlike cinema critic with 50 years of experience to do that.
Yeah, slark is probably better. I was using ursa but it is hard to kill some heroes with him.
This one's even older, but get fucking destroyed
slark huskr ursa bristle encha to send these 2k overthrowers to the fucking stone-age
ta is decent, havent tried lifestealer but its another of those low cd ie. 100% skirmish uptime solo kill heroes
slark is ultimate shitfucking hero in overshit. You shit fuck and dumpster shitstains back to the fucking stoneage so ez, more than half of them dc after 4-5 mins.
???????????
YEA THATs RARE AF NOW FIND ME 10 MORE LIKE THIS
loool
btw dawn of war 3 is happening for real god damn it, lets just hope sega doesnt turn it to shit.
also the music in the video reminded me of tool
14 is too old
pretty püssy for a 14, you young guys are lucky to live in 2016 at 15 :)
You didn't get the idea guys. My goal is not to win, but to make someone's life miserable. What I was doing so far is picking ursa, getting oov-phase and just running and some particluar guy until he either dies or goes back to base and then I just stalk him the whole game, camping right outside of his base, spamming ">Good game, well played" in chat whenever I kill him and watch this kid rage.
I was just wondering if there's some better hero to do that. I guess skywrath Q spam or lina are decent and so is slark.
testing overwatch
@Goethe
Schindlers Liste ist ein guter Film wenn du den noch nicht geschaut hast, ist aber halt alt
@spunki if you don't reduce the amount of the same pic i'll report you
^^SeemsGood
man of steel is super garbage, rush is ok, shindler's list is good. without the penultimate scene (with the watch) this film would be actually godlike.
FUCKING ROFL
shiiiieeet
I liked Man of Steel though.
oh my god Afeect..
Rewatched the first part, few days ago, nice remake from this old yt gold
Pla don't repot me 4kopf
Umm guyz u seen predestination?
Some guy told me it's a mind fuk one i said k I'll watch :/
i m talking about their objective quality, and not whether i liked them or not.
scary movie is 10/10 garbage, but in the same time i rly enjoyed watching it; citizen kane is really decent, but not fun to watch.
Who decides what movies are "good" or "bad" though? Such things will always be subjective. Yes, better acting, plot, directing etc CAN make a movie better, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't watch a movie just because your friend or whatever said it's bad, you may still end up liking it.
how does that contradict what i said
It doesn't, I just think there is no such thing as "objective quality" because the quality of a movie is dependant on way too many things to possibly be objective.
Objective quality is when you get fancy awards
well, basing on what i studied, u can easily get a rough evaluation of film's quality basing on acting, directing, camera movements, scene dynamics, panorama, etc., and u do not have to be a godlike cinema critic with 50 years of experience to do that.
wooo
end of this page
how do you know? whats the comment limit
The big lebowski, thts a nice movie
50, but it's probably still ~15 or something away, it looked long af, but then I saw 10 tinder pics xD
boys had a nice day @ europapark in germany. have seen gaystrong only at lunch. today was a good day
Dos Catos, congratulate THOMAS LANDOLT on his new job :X
nah m8, i don't think he likes me
:DDDD
goodfucking lord i have school in 6 hrs and i cant sleep because for 2 weeks i only went to bed at 5 am
The struggle is real.
https://streamable.com/ncaj
03:18 - Da Vinci: guys let's make a bet
03:18 - Da Vinci: I bet ur a virgin EleGiggle
Allison
http://stack.net.au/movies/news/vikings-star-headlines-supanova-in-sydney-and-perth
come to sydney
i won
want to counterpick a hero spammer wannabe he said
and volvo hate me